Front Page Reviews Abstracts Guidelines Trustees Members Contact Us

EPUAP Logo  

EUROPEAN PRESSURE ULCER ADVISORY PANEL

Abstracts

ABSTRACTS FROM THE 2ND WORLD UNION OF
WOUND HEALING SOCIETIES MEETING
Paris, 8–13 July 2004

PRESSURE ULCERS AND NUTRITION: A NEW EUROPEAN GUIDELINE
M. Clark


Pressure ulcers are frequently associated with malnutrition; however to what extent is this relationship valid? The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP) has developed a new practice guideline addressing the role of nutrition in pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. This guideline highlights that currently there is no strong scientific evidencefor a direct relationship between poor nutrition and the development of pressure ulcers, although it is possible that poor nutrition may influence the vulnerability of tissue to extrinsic factors such as pressure. Stronger links exist between malnutrition and the delayed healing of pressure ulcers. The new guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary group with members drawn from five European countries. Much of the guideline was based on a new Cochrane review of the links between nutrition and pressure ulcers. The draft guideline was presented during the EPUAP Annual Conference in September 2003 and published
in draft form in the EPUAP Review with the guideline revised in light of comments received. The final version of the guideline available in eight European languages) covers the whole nutritional cycle and includes weighted recommendations with regard to nutritional screening, assessment, intervention, evaluation and followup. The guideline especially stresses the importance of integrating nutritional activities into daily pressure ulcer care. This presentation will discuss the development, content and implementation of the new guideline with implementation assisted through the development of a decision tree which can be used to aid the translation of the guideline into locally protocols of care. The European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel would like to thank Nutricia for an unrestricted educational grant that made development of the guideline possible.

Members of the Guideline Development Group were Benati G, Clark M, Cohn D. Jackson P, Kerry B, Langer G and Schols JMGA.


INTERRATER AND INTRARATER RELIABILITY OF THE EPUAP PRESSURE ULCER CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
T. Defloor, L. Schoonhoven


Background:

Correct identification and classification of a pressure ulcer is important for an accurate reporting of the magnitude of the problem, and for timely prevention. The reliability of classification systems has rarely been tested.

Aims:
To examine the interrater and intrarater reliability of classifying pressure ulcers according to the EPUAP classification system using pressure ulcer photographs.

Design:
Survey among nurses without special expertise in pressure ulcers.

Methods:
56 photographs of normal skin, blanchable erythema, pressure ulcers (PU) or incontinence lesions were correctly classified by 53 PU experts. The photographs were presented in a random order to 473 nurses. A random selection of 9 photographs were included twice. 83 nurses did the test twice within a time interval of one month.

Results:
The interrater reliability (k = 0.37) and the intrarater reliability (k=052) were low. Incontinence lesions were confused most frequently with superficial PU; 80.2% of the PU lesions (grade 2 and higher~ were identified as such. Nurses who classified more photographs correctly, remained consistent in their judgement. Nurses with a limited number of correct answers, frequently changed from opinion in between two sessions.

Conclusions:
The interrater and intrarater-reliability of the EPUAP-classification appears to be low for the assessment by nurses with no special expertise in PU. More attention should be given to training in PU classification. The description of the different PU grades should be further developed, based on their clinical presentation and not only on the anatomic limits of soft tissue damage.


OBSERVATION OF NON-BLANCHABLE ERYTHEMA
K. Vander Wee, B. De Neve, M. Grypdonck, T. Defloor

Introduction:

The use of risk assessment scales is recommended to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcers. For many patients however, applying these scales results in an inefficient use of preventive measures. Recent research has shown that waiting until non-blanchable erythema occurs before starting prevention is a more efficient method than using the Braden scale. It is important that non-blanchable erythema is correctly observed. The aim of this study is to examine two methods to observe non-blanchable erythema and to examine the interrater reliability of the observations.

Methods:
303 patients of an acute geriatric ward with erythema observed by the researcher participated in the study. Nurses observed heels, hips and sacrum daily. They scored
the presence of blanchable erythema or non-blanchable erythema. To distinguish between blanchable and nonblanchable erythema, both thumb and transparent disk were used. The researcher executed the same observations, independently.

Results:
The interrater reliability between nurse and researcher was both for the thumb method (k = 0.67) and transparent disk (k = 0.70) substantial. The agreement was higher for the sacrum than for the heels. The agreement between the observations with thumb and transparent disk was high, both at nurses (k = 0.88) and researcher (k = 0.88), however, more non-blanchable erythema was observed with the transparent disk. The agreement was higher for the heels, than for the sacrum.

Discussion:
The interrater reliability was higher for the sacrum than for the heels. When using a transparent disk more non-blanchable erythema was identified.


PRESSURE ULCER PREVALENCE: USING EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY IN THE IRISH HEALTH CARE SETTING
J. O’Brien, Z. Moore


Background:
Pressure ulcers are common however, in Ireland there are no national prevalence figures available and no national guidelines exist for pressure ulcer prevention and management.

Aims:
1) To gain insight into the use of the EPUAP pressure ulcer minimum data set.
2) To establish pressure ulcer prevalence
and risk status of the population in an acute hospital setting.
3) To identify the number and severity of pressure ulcers and prevention strategies in use.

Methods:
A survey was conducted using the EPUAP pressure ulcer minimum data set. Permission to conduct the study was granted from the Director of Nursing Services and ethical principles were adhered to. The study site was chosen using random sampling and all patients were assessed (n = 519). Data analysis was carried out utilising SPSS version 11

Results:
Pressure ulcer prevalence was 15%. Most patients were in the acute care/high dependency care setting (63%) and 20% were at risk of pressure ulcer development ranging from low high (Braden Scale). 78 pressure ulcers were identified and 57(73%)were grade 1 or 2 damage (EPUAP grading). A range of prevention measures was used, the appropriateness of these varied among the risk groups.

Discussion and Conclusion:
This study provides a clearer understanding of the scale, nature and severity of the problem of pressure ulceration. Based on this information plans can be drawn regarding appropriate resource allocation and future research within the Irish population.



SEVERITY, LOCATION, DURATION AND ORIGIN OF PRESSURE ULCER WOUNDS IN GERMANY
N. Lahmann, T. Dassen


Introduction:
Data about the severity, location, duration and origin of pressure ulcer wounds in German Healthcare facilities are rare. Knowledge of these characteristics could be used to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic pressure ulcer management, i.e. long duration of pressure ulcer wounds may open the way for a discussion about the necessity of improved or new treatment procedures. In the years 2002 and 2003, the ‘Department of Nursing Science’ at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin conducted nationwide surveys on the prevalence of pressure ulcers in German hospitals and nursing homes, during which data about the severity, location, duration and origin of pressure ulcer wounds were obtained. The research question is: What are the differences of pressure ulcer wound characteristics between nursing homes and hospitals in Germany?

Method:
The study design consisted of two point prevalence studies conducted in April 2002 and April 2003. Specially trained ward nurses examined all hospital patients and nursing homes residents who were able to give informed consent. Where a pressure ulcer wound was diagnosed, the severity, origin, duration and location had to be stated. Demographicdata and a risk assessment according to the Braden scale were obtained. Chisquare was used to test for statistically significant differences.

Results:
2158 out of 21,574 hospital patients and nursing home residents had a total of 3,857 pressure ulcers. <sum> In hospitals 36.4% of these wounds were of severity grade 2 and higher; in nursing homes the percentage of these wounds was 46.7%. <sum> In hospitals 51.4% of all wounds were developed nosocomially compared to 60.2% in nursing homes. <sum> In hospitals 7.4 % of all wounds have persisted for more than three months, 29.7% in nursing homes <sum> In both types of institutions they were mostcommonly located on the lower back area and the heels.

Summary:
In Germany pressure ulcer wounds in nursing homes are more severe, persist longer and more often develop nosocomially in nursing homes than in hospitals.



URBAN AND RURAL USA NURSES’ KNOWLEDGE OF PRESSURE
E.A. Ayello, FAAN, K. Zulkowski, ONS, RN, CWS


Introduction:

Pressure ulcers continue to be an important issue for nursing home residents in the United States. Documentations and treatment of pressure ulcers are critical components in the provision of optimal care, in this population. In long term care (LTC) facilities, it is the staff nurses that must understand how to assess risk for pressure ulcers that have developed, and implement prevention/ treatment programmes. The knowledge level of nurses employed in long term care facilities has not been examined. Nurses in rural areas may have fewer opportunities for continuing education programmes than their urban counterparts. It is not known if there is a difference in pressure ulcer knowledge by geographic location.

Methods:
Nurses employed in LTC both urban and rural settings have been invited to participate in the study by completing a standardized pressure ulcer knowledge tool developed by Pieper and a demographic sheet developed by the authors.

Results:
Data is being analysed using SPSS 11.5 statistical software. Data collection is in progress with over 700 surveys mailed. The presentation will give the results of both urban and rural nurses knowledge of pressure ulcer identification, risk and treatment using a standardized pressure ulcer tool developed by Pieper.

Discussion:
These data will help in planning future continuingeducation programmes for staff level nurses to enhance pressure ulcer care.


A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY TO EXPLORE THE EXPERIENCE OF LIVING WITH A PRESSURE ULCER
C. Dealey, A. Hopkins, D. Colin, T. Defloor

Background:

Little is known of the impact of pressure ulcers on an individual’s quality of life. This phenomenological study set out to investigate the impact of pressure ulceration on a variety of people with different underlying pathologies from several countries across Europe. This paper is reporting the first stage of the study, testing the impact of having multiple data collectors and translation from one language to another for analysis as well as the findings from eight patients.

Methods:
Patients over the age of 65 years, with a grade 3 or 4 pressure ulcer which had been present more than one month, were recruited to the study. Each patient was interviewed using an unstructured format. The interviews were taped and then transcribed. The transcriptions were sent to one person for analysis. Standardised training was given to all those undertaking the interviews. Following analysis the emerging themes from each interview were examined with the interviewer to ensure validity. Transcripts that were translated into English were verified by the interviewer for accuracy.

Results:
A total of eight patients have been recruited from four centres, three in the UK and one in Belgium. Emerging themes from the interviews are pain, sudden loss, restriction and equipment, Discussion of the results will focus on the issues of validity that arise from a pan-European qualitative study, in particular the cultural and translation influence within interview based methodology and the reliability of the emerging themes within a population that have multiple pathologies.


THE EFFECT OF CLOTHING ON THE MEASUREMENT OF INTERFACE PRESSURE
J.M. Melhuish, M. Clark, R.J. Williams, K.G. Harding

Introduction:

The measurement of interface pressure between subjects and associated support surfaces has been
exhaustively researched. The effect of clothing on these measurements has been discussed but there is little work that has examined the effect on measured interface pressure. It is known and we have demonstrated that measured interface pressure is dependent on the hardness of the support
surfaces for most types of sensors.

Aim:
To examine the effect of clothing materials and associated clothing structures (ACS) in a controlled environment on the measured interface pressure.

Method:
Synthetic mixes, Various Cotton garments and sheets were selected for testing. Small pieces of material approximately 20 x 20 cm were cut from each garment. Measurements were undertaken on the plain material, a 1.5 cm folded crease, seams, pockets and buttons. The materials were placed as a sandwiched between two layers of foam (Shore “00” hardness 42) and two 10 x 10 cm metal plates. The plates were then loaded to apply 50 mmHg. Interface pressure was measured using a Tally Oxford pressure monitor. One piece of material and its ACS’s was tested using 7
foams of increasing hardness, (shore 16–50 “000” scale), loading 25mmHg.

Results:
The Median (Range) of the measured control interface pressure was 50 (50–50)mmHg. Their was little effect shown on the measured interface pressures for plain materials 50 (45–54) mmHg. Their were varying affects for the ACS’s, not including buttons, 64.5(42–148) including buttons 68(42–310). Increasing foam hardness was associated with increasing measured interface pressure this became more pronounced for the ACS’s. For plain material, structures and buttons these were for foam 1 (hardness 16 “000”) 12(12–13) 13(11–16), 28(27–29)mmHg, and for foam 7 (hardness 50 “000”) 23(23–24), 27.5(22–50), 113 (113–11 5)mmHg.

Conclusion:
Clothing has a variable effect on the measured interface pressure this being very small for plain surfaces but
can be greatly increased over associated material structures.

 
Review Contents Return to Top Next Page

© European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel
Contact Us

Maintenance: 3.E.Media